tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3043229825593599809.post8226625023767194600..comments2023-10-07T04:57:08.423-07:00Comments on Tribune Editors Blog: Are we trivializing war crimes? NOOnline Editorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08994626373624947863noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3043229825593599809.post-73655916022302195532010-07-24T07:50:24.811-07:002010-07-24T07:50:24.811-07:00Nice blog :)
stock photos | stock images | royalty...Nice blog :)<br /><a href="http://depositphotos.com?ref=1022536" rel="nofollow">stock photos</a> | <a href="http://depositphotos.com?ref=1022536" rel="nofollow">stock images</a> | <a href="http://depositphotos.com?ref=1022536" rel="nofollow">royalty-free images</a>esarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11431695235355475748noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3043229825593599809.post-25754132278656362282008-08-08T18:10:00.000-07:002008-08-08T18:10:00.000-07:00As a Soldier who has spent 28 months in Iraq, I wi...As a Soldier who has spent 28 months in Iraq, I wish you and your readers would fully read the "Geneva Conventions". Mainly because the reference is nearly always used in the wrong context, such as prisoner detainment. The Geneva's deal with how medical aid will be rendered to POW's and other injured combatants captured on the battlefield. It does not cover how, otherwise, healthy prisoners will be treated.<BR/><BR/>Those rules come from the "Hague Protocols", which specifically points out the difference between a uniformed member of a countries armed forces, and enemy combatants. A uniformed Soldier is covered by the Hague, in the manner of his humane treatment.<BR/><BR/>A guerrilla fighter is not. 95% of the Abu Ghraib prisoners were, and are, nothing more than criminal guerrilla fighters. There are NO conventions or protocols that cover the treatment of enemy combatants that do NOT wear the uniform of the armed force of their country.<BR/><BR/>The Senate and Congress is filled to the gills with lawyers, yet not one...NOT ONE...has brought any credible evidence of any crime committed by President Bush in the execution of this war.<BR/><BR/>In other words, the Tribune has it right; no reason to put non-news articles on the front page.<BR/><BR/>SSG David Medzyk--US ArmyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3043229825593599809.post-2276274677862088302008-06-27T10:56:00.000-07:002008-06-27T10:56:00.000-07:00I thought the Guantanamo Bay series was invaluable...I thought the Guantanamo Bay series was invaluable coverage of the so-called War on Terror. Thank you for running it in full.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com